Our family law team achieved a landmark victory in the Court of Appeal, successfully arguing that alimony awards must be based on concrete facts and evidence rather than assumptions about a party's financial capacity.
Background
Our client, a successful businessman, was facing an excessive alimony award from the High Court based largely on assumptions about his wealth and earning capacity. The trial court had awarded substantial monthly maintenance without proper consideration of actual financial circumstances or supporting evidence.
The Trial Court's Approach
The High Court had made several problematic findings:
- Assumed wealth based on lifestyle and business ownership
- Speculative income calculations without supporting evidence
- Ignored actual financial constraints and business obligations
- Failed to consider the recipient's own earning capacity
Our Appeal Strategy
Key Legal Arguments
Evidence-Based Decision Making
- Burden of proof on applicant
- Concrete evidence required
- Complete financial disclosure
- Judicial scrutiny necessary
Proportionality Principles
- Reasonable needs assessment
- Actual capacity to pay
- Long-term sustainability
- Fairness to both parties
The Court of Appeal Decision
"Maintenance awards must be grounded in concrete facts and evidence, not speculation about a party's wealth or earning capacity."
Key Holdings
- Factual Foundation Required - Awards must be based on evidence, not assumptions
- Proper Evidence Standards - Courts must require proper financial disclosure
- Balanced Approach - Both parties' circumstances must be considered
- Sustainability Focus - Awards must be viable long-term
Result: Substantial reduction in monthly maintenance obligation, sustainable payment structure based on actual capacity, cost award in our favor, and business operations preserved.